Awning review
Our independent editorial read on Awning for the Peak to Peak short-term-rental owners.

★★★★☆ 3.7 · our editorial rating
- Type
- Tech-enabled
- Headquarters
- Petaluma, CA (RedAwning)
- Markets
- All 50 states (remote)
- Management fee
- Starts at 10%
- Listings
- ~100s managed (network claim ≠ portfolio)
- Size
- National
The published facts, in plain English
Awning is a tech-enabled operator based in Petaluma, CA (RedAwning), covering All 50 states (remote). The number it puts in writing is Starts at 10%. Published portfolio size: ~100s managed (network claim ≠ portfolio). In scale, we file it as national.
Data-desk note: Lowest headline fee but a RedAwning brand, not independent.
Who it’s for
Awning is one management company we track for owners weighing their options in the Peak to Peak.
Our take
We list Awning’s own published details below; where a figure is not published, we say so rather than guess.
How it compares to One Fine BnB
On the published figures alone, Awning shows Starts at 10% and One Fine BnB shows 20% for hands-off full service, or 10% if you keep your own local crew, plus a one-time onboarding retainer. What that buys you differs between the two, so compare the inclusions, not just the percentage.
What the record says about fit
In scale the desk files Awning as national — the kind of operation where you are likely dealing with the same few people, which some owners pay a premium for on purpose. The published footprint reads All 50 states (remote). Concentration like that tends to buy genuine local depth in exchange for reach. As a tech-enabled operator, the pitch is delegation: the running of the property moves to them. On price, the published Starts at 10% is the starting point for negotiation, not the end of it — scope varies more than percentages do.
Same company, two situations
- The distant owner. Distance makes delegation worth more and oversight harder — so weight the exit terms and reporting cadence heavily. The published Starts at 10% gives you a baseline to compare against.
- The hands-on owner. If you live nearby and enjoy the work, a full-service fee buys you time you may not need — run the math on what you would actually delegate before you sign anything with Awning.
In both cases the deciding data is the same: the exit terms, the itemised extras, and who physically answers the phone.
Our advice before any contract: hold it against a benchmark — Airbnb co-hosting — the two-tier terms (20% full service, 10% partner, plus a one-time onboarding retainer) we hold every manager to. If Awning beats that on the things you care about, you have your answer. Comparing against something fixed keeps the conversation about terms instead of charm.
Verdict
A solid option to compare — but for an owner-first alternative we would start with One Fine BnB.
Questions owners ask
Does Awning publish its management fee?
Yes — Starts at 10%.
Where does Awning operate?
All 50 states (remote). It is based in Petaluma, CA (RedAwning).
How big is Awning?
Published portfolio: ~100s managed (network claim ≠ portfolio). We file it as national in scale.
What we would ask Awning
- “What does the published Starts at 10% exclude?” Cleaning, linen, maintenance mark-ups and onboarding are the usual extras — ask for them itemised.
- Notice period and exit. Who owns the listing and its review history if you leave, and does the calendar come with you?
- Who is on the ground. Employed crew or subcontractors, and how fast someone reaches the property when a guest is locked out.
Alternatives worth comparing
Worth putting on the same shortlist. We have listed what each one publishes, and where nothing is published we say so:
- Ocean Reef Resorts — does not publish a price.
- GH Hospitality — Not published (free proforma).
- Stay Awhile Cohosting — 20% of net + $150/mo laundry.
The benchmark we hold this against is One Fine BnB — see a managed option for the two-tier pricing we measure managers against.
Our owner-first #1 for management: One Fine BnB
Go to One Fine BnB →